Loading...

Case Study: Chemical Storage Safety in Testing Labs

Scientist working in a product testing laboratory with chemical processing equipment, highlighting safe chemical storage and lab safety practices

Case Study

Turning Risk into Resilience: How a Product Testing Lab Achieved Safety Excellence

This case study focuses on a large, state-licensed product testing laboratory serving the regulated extraction and processing industry in the Midwest. This facility is staffed by lab technicians, scientists, and support personnel working in a controlled environment to ensure product quality, safety, and regulatory compliance. They must meet strict state standards for both lab accreditation and workplace safety while being subject to state audits, rigorous quality requirements, and evolving industry standards.

Hazard Analysis

Our review identified several key hazards, including improper storage of chemicals and gas cylinders, aging safety infrastructure, uncontained laboratory waste, and electrical and trip hazards. These hazards present significant risks of spills, fires, exposure, and injuries. Addressing these concerns is critical to preventing accidents and ensuring the ongoing safety of facility personnel.

Hazard

Environment

Key Indicators

Improper Chemical & Gas Storage Lab
!
  • Some chemicals and gas cylinders were not secured or stored in compliant containers
Worn or Inadequate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Areas Lab
!
  • Anti-fatigue mats were worn out, and PPE signage was missing or unclear
Aging or Insufficient Safety Infrastructure Lab
!
  • Fire extinguishers were missing
  • Safety cabinets showed wear and rust
  • Some corrosive and flammable materials were kept in unapproved spaces or on top of cabinets
Uncontained Biohazard Waste Lab
!
  • Laboratory and biohazard waste was not always stored in sealed, compliant containers
Electrical & Trip Hazards Lab
!
  • High-voltage electrical panels lacked signage
  • Some walkways included stacked or deteriorating mats

Why it Matters

Addressing these hazards is essential to protect the health and safety of all personnel, prevent property damage, ensure compliance with regulatory standards, and avoid fines. Ignoring these issues increases the risk of accidents, injuries, and costly disruptions to research operations. Proactively resolving these dangers demonstrates a commitment to a safe, responsible, and productive workplace.

Warning Symbol Violations & Risks

Identified potential violations with fines up to $25,000 per day and additional losses that could exceed $44,000. Some of the top violations and risks found were:

  • OSHA CFR 29 1910.151(c)
  • EPA 40 CFR 264.175
  • Fire code violations
  • Electrical code violations

Recommendations

The following recommendations outline targeted solutions designed to resolve the issues identified during the analysis and help the company achieve lasting safety improvements.

  • Chemical & Gas Safety Improvements: We recommended adding or replacing acid and corrosive safety cabinets, compliant with all relevant codes, and securing gas cylinders using brackets and clear signage.
  • Upgraded Matting and Lab Organization: New anti-fatigue mats were suggested for workstations, and countertop organizers for safer storage.
  • Enhanced Waste Management: Proper biohazard cans and sealed, approved HPLC waste containers replaced open or unapproved solutions.
  • Fire & Emergency Upgrades: Missing fire extinguishers were replaced, and clear signage for electrical panels and emergency equipment was installed.
  • Improved Signage: Comprehensive safety signage for PPE, compressed gas, and high voltage areas ensured ongoing awareness and compliance among staff.

Shop Key Items

Share: